Allium vs Zerion: wallet APIs that scale to warehouses and streams
Compare Allium and Zerion across data reliability, scalability, pricing predictability, and readiness for production-grade applications.

Allium deviates 0.000011% from ground truth node data, vs 7.2% for community platforms (source)
How Allium and Zerion Differ
Zerion is built for wallet and portfolio APIs. Allium gives you the same APIs plus streams and warehouse delivery. Phantom peaks at 90,000 requests per second on it.

Allium vs Zerion, feature by feature





Which to choose

FAQ
Zerion is focused on real-time wallet and portfolio APIs for consumer crypto apps. Allium is a full data platform built for teams that need verified data, transparency, and infrastructure that scales beyond APIs into analytics and production use.
Zerion is a strong choice for fast wallet integrations. Allium is better suited for teams that care about long-term scale, predictable costs, and data they can trust in production.
Yes for core needs like balances, transactions, prices, and tokens. Allium also supports custom schemas, historical backfills, streaming, and native warehouse integration when teams need more flexibility.
Zerion's self-serve plans cap at 10 to 300 requests per second, with 1,000+ on Enterprise. Allium rate limits are negotiated, with no hard caps.
Teams usually start with Zerion for speed and switch when they need verified data, higher scale, predictable pricing, or access to data outside fixed API endpoints. That's typically when API limitations start to show.
Allium Platform Overview
Unlike Zerion’s API-first approach focused on wallet data, Allium provides multiple delivery methods to match how production teams actually work, combining low-latency APIs with real-time streaming, SQL access, and warehouse delivery, across both historical and live data.
Proof you can check
10,000+
Protocols
10,000+
Decoded schemas
99.9%
Uptime SLA
SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type I and II
Pricing
Start building on verified data
